The Secret to Inner Strength: How to Build Resilience and Confidence

Key Takeaways

  • Sustained leadership performance stops being about pure personal effort and starts being about the everyday structures you build to support your capacity.
  • True resilience is a dynamic, everyday practice where you learn to bend without breaking rather than pretending to be completely emotional bulletproof.
  • Overcommitment and trying to maintain an impossible image of perfection are the strongest predictors of mental distress and rapid energy erosion.
  • Protecting your calendar with brief daily micro-breaks and unplugged hours allows for the psychological detachment your mind requires to fully recover.
  • Real confidence grows when you practice small acts of micro-bravery that stretch your skills and give your brain concrete proof of your capability.
  • Inner power develops when you anchor your self-worth in your personal values and authentic self-expression instead of chasing constant public approval.

Many professionals look highly capable on the outside while feeling completely unsure of themselves on the inside. High-achieving people frequently experience a deep self-doubt about their own competence despite having a long record of real success. This pattern of inner distress coexists with high performance across demanding fields. People can maintain an outward appearance of total competence while suffering from severe hidden pressure and poorer mental health.

True inner strength means you can adapt to difficult situations, not that you are untouched by them. True resilience means you possess positive adaptation during times of trouble, rather than being emotionally bulletproof. It operates as a dynamic process where a person bends but does not break under pressure. You build real health by staying present, open, and guided by your core values during hard experiences.

You can develop leadership resilience strategies in everyday, sustainable ways. Resilience does not require rare heroism. It comes from ordinary systems that you can support with practical protective choices. Training programs that mix mindfulness and behavior adjustments build measurable personal strength. When you build self-efficacy, you expand your belief in your own ability to handle difficult demands. This internal trust shields you from stress and keeps your performance steady over the long term.

What Inner Strength Really Means (And What It Doesn’t)

Many people misunderstand what it takes to stay steady under pressure. They think real power means forcing down their feelings or hiding their pain. Suppressing emotions does not make you resilient. Habitually hiding your feelings actually harms your well-being and breaks down your relationships with other people. Stable strength does not demand endless positive thoughts either. Healthy mental functioning allows you to experience unpleasant feelings while you still take meaningful actions guided by your core values. Finally, strength is not endless self-sacrifice. Taking on too much care for others without limits creates lasting physical and mental exhaustion that ruins your quality of life.

Inner strength depends on your everyday mental structures. First, it requires the ability to recognize and manage your feelings. People who cannot regulate their emotions experience much higher rates of anxiety and deep exhaustion. Managing your internal responses protects your mind from breaking down during tough chapters. Second, leadership resilience strategies mean you adapt well after facing trauma, business threats, or major losses. It does not mean you avoid pain or bypass distress. You simply learn to navigate the storm without letting it destroy your health.

Lastly, a steady identity protects you from external chaos. Knowing who you are outside of your executive title reduces stress and prevents depressive symptoms. A stable sense of self keeps you grounded when your professional landscape changes. You stop relying on outside approval to feel successful. Real power is a structural framework that protects your capacity.

The Two Core Pillars: Resilience and Confidence

Leadership resilience strategies rest on two separate but connected pillars. The first pillar is resilience. Resilience means you possess the capacity to adapt successfully and recover your normal functioning after you face adversity, trauma, or major stress. It is a dynamic process where you return to your true self after setbacks instead of suffering permanent impairment. You do not achieve resilience by avoiding distress altogether. Instead, you learn to maintain or regain your psychological functioning even after highly difficult events occur. This capacity keeps you stable during ongoing pressure.

The second pillar is confidence, which is built on a scientific foundation called self-efficacy. Confidence means you trust your own capability to organize and execute the actions needed to manage future situations. You do not need absolute certainty about the future to take action. When you possess high self-efficacy, you show a greater willingness to engage with challenging tasks. You persist longer because you trust your ability to cope instead of just waiting for a guaranteed success. This type of self-belief directly changes how you think, how you feel, how you motivate yourself, and how you act during uncertain times.

These two pillars work together to protect your professional performance. Resilience acts as the tool that rebuilds your energy after a setback. Once you recover your baseline, confidence channels that renewed energy into effective action. People who recover well from stress develop a stronger trust in their ability to manage future challenges. Over time, your capacity to recover and your self-belief reinforce one another. Strengthening your adaptive coping skills improves both your physical resilience and your internal confidence, creating a sustainable system for long-term success.

What Diminishes Inner Strength (Even in Highly Capable People)

Inner strength fades when we ignore the structures that support our day-to-day performance. A major cause of this erosion is chronic workplace stress that goes unmanaged over a long period. This unmanaged stress leads to deep exhaustion, a cold or cynical attitude toward your job, and a feeling that you are no longer effective at work. Capable leaders often make the mistake of overcommitting to their roles. Overcommitment is directly linked to higher levels of emotional fatigue. When there is a mismatch between the huge effort you put in and the rewards you get back, your core energy drains away quickly.

Holding onto impossible standards also breaks down your system from the inside out. Trying to be perfect all the time leads to serious problems like anxiety, obsessive thoughts, and depression. This self-critical way of thinking triggers a lot of psychological distress, deep shame, and lower self-worth. For highly intelligent and capable professionals, perfectionism and self-doubt are the strongest predictors of mental distress. You cannot maintain performance when your inner voice constantly tells you that your best is never enough.

Your power also diminishes when you shape your entire identity around the needs of others. Constantly trying to please people and craving their approval links directly to poorer mental health. Relying too much on the validation of close relationships or professional circles causes severe anxiety and depressive symptoms. A strong fear of losing these connections can stop you from making the right choices for your business and your life.

Finally, trying to power through tough chapters without stopping to rest destroys your capacity. You must detach from work during your free time to repair your mind and body. Failing to step away from your tasks prolongs your mental strain. True recovery requires true psychological detachment, relaxation, and moments of mastery outside of your daily job. Without these regular recovery cycles, your exhaustion will grow until your performance slips.

Daily Practices to Strengthen Resilience

Building leadership resilience strategies does not require massive schedule overhauls. You can protect your capacity through small, deliberate choices embedded in your normal routine.

You can use emotional recovery rituals to manage daily fatigue. Taking short micro-breaks during the day successfully reduces exhaustion and increases your overall vigor. These brief daily pauses allow your mind to step away from active stress. Pairing these breaks with slow breathing practices alters your autonomic nervous system and down-regulates your body’s physical stress response. Recovery also relies on intentional psychological detachment from work demands. Stepping away entirely during nonwork hours stops mental strain from building up over time.

Practicing reflective awareness helps you track your daily energy. Standard reflective writing interventions yield small but meaningful benefits for your mental health. Writing down what drained you versus what restored you changes how you process your workday. Positive writing specifically lifts your mood and sharpens your cognitive processing. Reflecting on what helped or restored your emotional energy reduces overall stress. This habit ensures that you do not leave your daily recovery up to chance.

Ending your day with self-acknowledgment prevents your inner critic from dominating your mind. Self-affirmation exercises involve reflecting on your personal values and core strengths. This practice improves well-being by reminding you how you acted in line with your standards during tough moments. Kind end-of-day reviews reduce stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms much better than harsh self-criticism. Recognizing your effort during difficult tasks builds deep personal strength. When you judge yourself by your actions instead of focusing only on perfect outcomes, you stabilize your internal system.

Confidence-Building Habits That Don’t Rely on External Validation

Internal trust grows when you accumulate direct proof of your own capability. Relying on outside praise creates an unstable foundation for your leadership. Instead, you can build steady internal proof by practicing micro-bravery. Micro-bravery means taking on small, manageable challenges that stretch your skills without snapping your nervous system. In self-efficacy theory, these performance accomplishments serve as mastery experiences. They are the single most powerful source of lasting confidence. Taking small, deliberate actions creates concrete data that you can handle difficult demands. Structured, repeated practice of these small skills expands your effort, helps you persist through obstacles, and upgrades your day-to-day coping behavior.

You can also protect your leadership resilience strategies by intentionally shifting your internal self-talk. Shifting your thoughts from fear of failure to a focus on learning operates as a form of cognitive reappraisal. Cognitive reappraisal allows you to change the meaning of a stressful situation. This adjustment helps you regulate your emotional responses and reframe fear-based thoughts into more adaptive interpretations. Deliberate self-talk training successfully reduces performance anxiety while lifting self-confidence and execution. Asking yourself how a challenge can help you grow serves as a useful tool to manage uncertainty. While a growth mindset is a modest tool rather than a magic fix, changing your internal narrative helps you face tough business landscapes with less friction.

Another practical habit is keeping a weekly written list of the challenges you navigated successfully. Writing down meaningful experiences broadens your cognitive processing and supports your overall well-being. This positive writing practice gives your brain a factual record of prior successful coping and task completion. Self-affirmation exercises that focus on your internal strengths protect you from the depletion that comes from chasing constant public approval. When you track your own adequacy, you establish a system where confidence carries the load of your responsibilities. You stop waiting for external certainty before you make a definitive move.

Inner Strength Through Identity, Not Image

Leadership resilience strategies require you to anchor your daily life in internal values instead of public approval. Your overall well-being gets its strongest support when you experience autonomy, competence, and close relationships. Acting mainly from external pressure or chasing outside validation damages your mental health. Across twenty-seven European countries, professionals who fulfill these basic psychological needs experience a deeper meaning in life and show far fewer depressive symptoms. When you feel threatened by business changes or market drops, self-affirmation exercises help you steady your system. Taking time to reconnect with your core values and your self-integrity shields your mind from external chaos.

To build this internal power, you must ask yourself who you are when you are not performing in your executive role. Possessing a stable self-concept links directly to higher life satisfaction and lower perceived stress. A steady sense of self and your daily well-being reinforce each other over time. When you know your worth outside of your professional output, you stay grounded during tough chapters. Living with authenticity is closely linked to higher engagement and better mental health. Real power grows from congruent self-expression where your daily actions match your inner truth, rather than from putting on a constant performance for your team or industry.

You must let go of the idea that strength means being perfect. Perfectionism is a highly risky model for any professional because it is heavily associated with depression, generalized anxiety, and social anxiety in adults. Trying to maintain a flawless image creates severe emotional strain. Instead of pursuing perfection, focus on integrity and system alignment. Psychological flexibility means you choose to act in line with your values even when your thoughts and emotions feel difficult. Prioritizing value-guided action over flawless execution preserves your energy and keeps your professional capacity sustainable for years to come.

What to Expect When You Start Showing Up Stronger

Shifting your approach to professional performance means your daily interactions will change. When you implement new leadership resilience strategies, you can expect some initial friction. Saying no and setting clear limits can reduce your overextension at work. However, practicing assertive communication requires you to state your needs and rights directly. This directness often feels uncomfortable when you are used to self-denial. You may feel a wave of guilt when you first protect your time. Training programs show that this guilt decreases and self-esteem increases only after you practice these boundary habits repeatedly.

Relational demands can become heavy or unhealthy when people around you are used to your constant overextension. Setting new limits can cause brief disruptions in your professional and personal networks. This resistance from your environment is a normal part of changing an old operational pattern. You are refusing to take on unnecessary weight, and the system around you must adjust to your new carrying capacity.

This type of personal growth often feels like a loss before it feels like strength. Making a major identity change involves a temporary disruption to your self-concept. It requires a significant emotional adjustment as you leave behind old habits. Positive psychological change does not mean you instantly feel fine. True growth emerges directly through the struggle with highly challenging experiences.

Experiencing discomfort does not mean you are backsliding. Factual data shows that authentic living predicts much higher life satisfaction and greater long-term well-being. In contrast, self-alienation and constantly accepting external influence lower your mental health. The discomfort you feel from becoming self-directed is simply the cost of building a sustainable performance system.

Reinforcement Routines: Sustaining Strength Over Time

Sustaining long term leadership resilience strategies requires regular routines that protect your available capacity. A weekly check in practice allows you to evaluate your ongoing system performance. Journaling interventions provide significant benefits for mental health because they help you notice coping patterns over time. Reviewing your week by asking where you bounced back and where you trusted your own decisions fits self efficacy theory. Factual proof shows that your confidence grows when you track past moments of successful coping. Because self efficacy connects closely with resilient functioning, intentional weekly reflection prevents you from returning to old habits.

You can also use your calendar as a concrete load management tool. Scheduling short micro breaks throughout your day successfully reduces fatigue and increases your professional vigor. Protecting your time off through scheduled breaks and unplugged time allows for necessary psychological detachment from work demands. Detaching from work during nonwork hours is a proven recovery experience that directly supports employee well being. Interventions that improve your ability to step away from your job have clear beneficial effects. Placing strict boundaries on your calendar ensures that your recovery cycles carry the weight of your daily responsibilities.

Surrounding yourself with the right spaces and voices acts as a major protective health resource. Social support is positively associated with resilience. Supportive relationships help you maintain your operational stamina when faced with heavy workplace stress. Factual evidence proves that strong social connections are linked with a lower risk of mortality over time. Public health data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirms that social connection is a vital protective factor for long term well being. Choosing environments that reinforce your healthy growth keeps your internal architecture aligned with your values.

Empowering the Strategy Within

Inner strength does not mean you never struggle or feel the weight of your responsibilities. Resilience is about your capacity to return to your true self after stress, failure, or major emotional challenges. You can build a steady and reliable routine by shifting your focus away from endless personal effort and focusing on your structural support instead. Protecting your baseline through small choices ensures that your well-being remains a sustainable asset for your career. When you manage the internal structures that cause exhaustion, you safeguard your performance and your health.

Admitting that your internal system is under strain is a strategic acknowledgment of your current capacity. You stop wasting valuable energy on the performance of being fine. This transparency allows you to lead from a place of integrity and alignment with your core values. You can pause and ask yourself what version of you is asking to rise, and how you can support their growth today. Inner strength grows when you build an adaptive framework that protects your body and mind from the rigorous demands of success.

If you are ready to stop managing the symptoms of stress and start managing the system that causes it, you can take action today by joining our community newsletter or registering for our next upcoming live masterclass. Connecting with these resources allows you to evaluate your current capacity and interact with a high-caliber network of peer level contributors. Taking charge of your internal environment is a necessary investment in your long term leadership stability, focus, and career longevity.

References

Albulescu, P., Macsinga, I., Rusu, A., Sulea, C., Bodnaru, A., & Tulbure, B. T. (2022). “Give me a break!” A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of micro-breaks for increasing well-being and performance. PLOS ONE, 17(8), e0272460.

Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 217–237.

Arch, J. J., Gloster, A. T., Twohig, M. P., Levin, M. E., & Ong, C. W. (2022). Acceptance and commitment therapy processes and mediation: Challenges and how to address them. Behavior Therapy, 53(6), 953–975.

Artino, A. R., Jr. (2012). Academic self-efficacy: From educational theory to instructional practice. Perspectives on Medical Education, 1(2), 76–85.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.

Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59(1), 20–28.

Bravata, D. M., Watts, S. A., Keefer, A. L., Madhusudhan, D. K., Taylor, K. T., Clark, D. M., Nelson, R. S., Cokley, K. O., & Hagg, H. K. (2020). Prevalence, predictors, and treatment of impostor syndrome: A systematic review. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 35(4), 1252–1275.

Buhle, J. T., Silvers, J. A., Wager, T. D., Lopez, R., Onyemekwu, C., Kober, H., Weber, J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2014). Cognitive reappraisal of emotion: A meta-analysis of human neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 24(11), 2981–2990.

Burnette, J. L., Billingsley, J., Banks, G. C., Knouse, L. E., Hoyt, C. L., Pollack, J. M., & Simon, S. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of growth mindset interventions: For whom, how, and why might such interventions work? Psychological Bulletin, 149(3–4), 174–205.

Burton, C. M., & King, L. A. (2009). The health benefits of writing about positive experiences: The role of broadened cognition. Psychology & Health, 24(8), 867–879.

Callaghan, T., Greene, D., Lunn, J., & Egan, S. J. (2024). The relationships between perfectionism and symptoms of depression, anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 109, 102381. x

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). Social connection. CDC.

Chan, B., & Rowe, M. (2014). A cultural exchange: Assertive communication training in Bangkok. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 24(1–2), 45–58.

Coutts, J. J., Hayes, A. F., & Jiang, T. (2023). I can see myself clearly now: Exploring the mediating role of self-concept clarity in the association between self-compassion and indicators of well-being. PLOS ONE, 18(6), e0286992.

Fekete, E. M., & Deichert, N. T. (2022). A brief gratitude writing intervention decreased stress and negative affect during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Happiness Studies, 23(6), 2427–2448.

Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362.

Gueroni, L. P. B., Souza, M. C., & Silva, M. A. I. (2023). Interventions for strengthening general self-efficacy beliefs in college students: An integrative review. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 31, e4040.

Gutgeld-Dror, M., Laor, N., & Karnieli-Miller, O. (2023). Assertiveness in physicians’ interpersonal professional encounters: A scoping review. Medical Education, 58(4), 392–404.

Han, A., & Kim, T. H. (2023). Effects of self-compassion interventions on reducing depressive symptoms, anxiety, and stress: A meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 14, 1553–1573.

Hansen, B. J., & Shrestha, S. (2024). Dependent Personality Disorder. StatPearls.

Harandi, T. F., Taghinasab, M. M., & Nayeri, T. D. (2017). The correlation of social support with mental health: A meta-analysis. Electronic Physician, 9(9), 5212–5222.

Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLOS Medicine, 7(7), e1000316.

Jayawickreme, E., Infurna, F. J., Alajak, K., Blackie, L. E. R., Chopik, W. J., Chung, J. M., Dorfman, A., Fleeson, W., Forgeard, M. J. C., Frazier, P., Furr, R. M., Grossmann, I., Heller, A. S., Laceulle, O. M., Lucas, R. E., Luhmann, M., Luong, G., Meijer, L., McLean, K. C., Park, C. L., Roepke, A. M., & Weststrate, N. M. (2021). Post-traumatic growth as positive personality change: Challenges, opportunities, and recommendations. Journal of Personality, 89(1), 145–165.

Joyce, S., Shand, F., Tighe, J., Laurent, S. J., Bryant, R. A., & Harvey, S. B. (2018). Road to resilience: A systematic review and meta-analysis of resilience training programmes and interventions. BMJ Open, 8(6), e017858.

Karabinski, T., Haun, V. C., Nübold, A., Wendsche, J., & Wegge, J. (2021). Interventions for improving psychological detachment from work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 26(3), 224–242.

Kashdan, T. B., & Rottenberg, J. (2010). Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 865–878.

Koutra, K., Mouatsou, C., & Psoma, S. (2023). The Influence of Positive and Negative Aspects of Perfectionism on Psychological Distress in Emerging Adulthood: Exploring the Mediating Role of Self-Compassion. Behavioral Sciences, 13.

Kristoffersen, M. (2019). Problematizing boundaries of care responsibility in caring relationships. SAGE Open Nursing, 5, 2377960818808692.

Kuang, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., & Chen, X. (2025). The mental health implications of people-pleasing: Development and validation of the Chinese People-Pleasing Questionnaire. Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Lai, J., Chen, Y., Liu, J., & Li, X. (2023). Efficacy of expressive writing versus positive writing in different populations: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1179345.

Li, X., Zhang, T., Zhao, G., Li, J., & Chen, C. (2025). How does physical activity alleviate nurse job burnout? The important role of recovery experiences. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1658020.

Li, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Liu, J. (2024). The relationship between self-compassion and resilience: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Research Protocols, 13, e60154.

Liu, Z., Heffernan, C., & Tan, J. (2020). Caregiver burden: A concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 7(4), 438–445.

Lunn, J., Greene, D., Callaghan, T., & Egan, S. J. (2023). Associations between perfectionism and symptoms of anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder and depression in young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 52(5), 460–487.

Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). The General Self-Efficacy Scale: Multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439–457.

Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543–562.

Lutz, P. K., Newman, D. B., Schlegel, R. J., & Wirtz, D. (2023). Authenticity, meaning in life, and life satisfaction: A multicomponent investigation. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 18(4), 602–615.

Maddux, J. E. (2016). Self-efficacy. In The Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer.

Martela, F., Ryan, R. M., & Steger, M. F. (2023). Needs and well-being across Europe: Basic psychological needs are closely connected with well-being, meaning, and symptoms of depression in 27 European countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 14(5), 501–514.

Martínez, R., Senín-Calderón, C., & Perona-Garcelán, S. (2020). Sociotropy, autonomy and emotional symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(16), 5716.

Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227–238.

Montpetit, M. A., Bergeman, C. S., & Bisconti, T. L. (2010). The self-concept and conjugal loss. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(5), 565–590.

Rosenthal, S., Schlussel, Y. R., Yaden, M. B., DeSantis, J., Trayes, K., Pohl, C. A., & Pohl, H. (2021). Persistent impostor phenomenon is associated with distress in medical students. Family Medicine, 53(2), 118–122.

Ryan, R. M., Duineveld, J. J., Di Domenico, S. I., Ryan, W. S., Steward, B. A., & Bradshaw, E. L. (2022). We know this much is (meta-analytically) true: A meta-review of meta-analytic findings evaluating self-determination theory. Psychological Bulletin, 148(11–12), 813–842.

Sagone, E., & De Caroli, M. E. (2016). “Yes… I can”: Psychological resilience and self-efficacy in adolescents. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 1(1), 141–148.

Schueler, K., Fritz, J., Dorfschmidt, L., van Harmelen, A.-L., Stroemer, E., Wessa, M., & Schmahl, C. (2021). Psychological network analysis of general self-efficacy in high vs. low resilient functioning healthy adults. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 736147.

Sherman, D. K., Lokhande, M., Müller, T., & Cohen, G. L. (2021). Self-affirmation interventions. In G. M. Walton & A. J. Crum (Eds.), Handbook of wise interventions: How social psychology can help people change (pp. 63–99). Guilford Press.

Shoman, Y., El May, E., Marca, S. C., Wild, P., Bianchi, R., Bugge, M. D., Caglayan, C., Cheptea, D., Gnesi, M., Godderis, L., Kiran, S., McElvenny, D. M., Mediouni, Z., Mehlum, I. S., Mijakoski, D., Minov, J., van der Molen, H. F., Nena, E., & Canu, I. G. (2023). Relationship between effort-reward imbalance, over-commitment and burnout in European healthcare workers: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(12), 6086.

Sohal, M., Singh, P., Dhillon, B. S., & Gill, H. S. (2022). Efficacy of journaling in the management of mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Family Medicine and Community Health, 10(1), e001154.

Sonnentag, S., Venz, L., & Casper, A. (2017). Advances in recovery research: What have we learned? What should be done next? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 365–380.

Southwick, S. M., Bonanno, G. A., Masten, A. S., Panter-Brick, C., & Yehuda, R. (2014). Resilience definitions, theory, and challenges: Interdisciplinary perspectives. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 5, 25338.

Sutton, A. (2020). Living the good life: A meta-analysis of authenticity, well-being and engagement. Personality and Individual Differences, 153, 109645.

Thomas, M., & Bigatti, S. (2020). Perfectionism, impostor phenomenon, and mental health in medicine: A literature review. International Journal of Medical Education, 11, 201–213.

Walter, N., Nikoleizig, L., & Alfermann, D. (2019). Effects of self-talk training on competitive anxiety, self-efficacy, volitional skills, and performance: An intervention study with junior sub-elite athletes. Sports, 7(6), 148.

World Health Organization. (2019). Burn-out an “occupational phenomenon”: International Classification of Diseases.

Wu, Q., Zhang, Y., Lu, J., & He, Q. (2023). Relationship between psychological detachment from work and depressive symptoms: The mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of self-compassion. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1231534.

Xiang, G., Li, Q., Du, X., Liu, X., Xiao, M., & Chen, H. (2023). Self-concept clarity and subjective well-being: Disentangling within- and between-person associations. Journal of Happiness Studies, 24, 823–843.

Yuan, Z., Yu, D., Zhao, H., Wang, Y., Jiang, W., & Chen, D. (2021). Burnout of healthcare workers based on the effort-reward imbalance model: A cross-sectional study in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8620.

Zaccaro, A., Piarulli, A., Laurino, M., Garbella, E., Menicucci, D., Neri, B., & Gemignani, A. (2018). How breath-control can change your life: A systematic review on psychophysiological correlates of slow breathing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 353.

Zhang, Y., Chen, B., & Wang, M. (2025). The impact of self-affirmation interventions on well-being: A meta-analysis. American Psychologist.

Leave a comment